Xref: utzoo news.groups:13476 alt.aquaria:4320 rec.pets:8859
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!inmos!mcwill
From: mcwill@inmos.co.uk (Iain McWilliams)
Newsgroups: news.groups,alt.aquaria,rec.pets
Subject: Re: ``rec.aquarium'' vote is invalid. Ignore it or vote no.
Keywords: .aquaria
Message-ID: <2622@ganymede.inmos.co.uk>
Date: 21 Oct 89 09:25:28 GMT
References: <21129@gryphon.COM>
Reply-To: mcwill@inmos.co.uk (Iain McWilliams)
Organization: INMOS Limited, Bristol, UK.
Lines: 26

In article <21129@gryphon.COM> richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton) writes:
>In article <2645@hydra.gatech.EDU> gs26@prism.gatech.EDU (Glenn R. Stone) writes:
>>[rec.aquaria] it will get to Europe, 
>
>The ruling I got jut last week from Europe is the same as I've
>been getting for 1.5 years from them. Rec.aquaria won't, 
>sci.aquaria will.

Can you explain why you believe rec.aquaria will not reach Europe ???
( Who gave the ruling ??? )

The reason I'm asking is because as of 3 weeks ago mcsun is importing
*ALL* newsgroups to Europe. Therefore all newsgroups make it to 
Europe and it is then up to each countries' backbone as to what groups
they carry. The UK receives everything bar alt.drugs and alt.sex.

IF some countries are choosing not to carry rec.all because of bandwidth
limitations, then surely that is their right, and should be respected not
short circuited.

Iain.
-- 
Iain McWilliams     Inmos Ltd, Bristol | EMail(UK) ukc!inmos!mcwill
---------------------------------------|     or    mcwill@inmos.co.uk
The opinions above are my personal     | Internet: mcwill@inmos.com
views and do not refelect Inmos policy.| UUCP:(US) uunet!inmos!mcwill