Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!usenet
From: goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu (David Goldfarb)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: New Groups Needed?
Summary: you're a little late.
Keywords: Fistfights, Fish
Message-ID: <1989Oct22.102446.24601@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 22 Oct 89 10:24:46 GMT
References: <460@s5.Morgan.COM>
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44)
Reply-To: goldfarb@ocf.Berkeley.EDU (David Goldfarb)
Organization: ucb
Lines: 18

In article <460@s5.Morgan.COM> amull@Morgan.COM (Andrew P. Mullhaupt) writes:
)Call for discussion:
)
)Should we split news.groups into two parts? I have in mind
)
)news.groups         {For calls, proposals, results}
)
)news.groups.d       {For discussion of group names, voting rules,
)                     philosophy of moderation, etc.}
)Andrew Mullhaupt

   As many people will no doubt point out, this split has *already* been
accomplished. Your "news.groups" exists as "news.announce.newgroups", and
"news.groups.d" is here.

David Goldfarb    goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu   (Insert standard disclaimer)
"Things can be replaced. Lives cannot."
          -- Data, in "The Ensigns of Command", by Melinda Snodgrass