Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bfmny0!tneff
From: tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff)
Newsgroups: news.misc
Subject: Re: Articles most often cited in comp.all
Message-ID: <14788@bfmny0.UU.NET>
Date: 23 Oct 89 19:37:44 GMT
References: <9185@elsie.UUCP>
Reply-To: tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff)
Lines: 12
Summary:
Expires:
Sender:
Followup-To:

In article <9185@elsie.UUCP> ado@elsie.UUCP (Arthur David Olson) writes:
>Here are ranks, citation counts, Message-IDs, and (if available)
>subjects, authors, and newsgroups of the articles most
>frequently cited by articles in the comp.all hierarchy
>in the last two weeks. ...

This sounds pretty cute, except the winning reference counts range from
6 down to 3 (!).  Is it really worth memorializing a handful of messages
that happened to have three followups?
-- 
I'm a Leo.  Leos don't believe    *  *  *     Tom Neff
    in this astrology stuff.        *  *  *   tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET