Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!letni!lawnet!greg
From: greg@lawnet.LawNet.Com (Gregory G. Petersen)
Newsgroups: news.sysadmin
Subject: Re: clarinet??????
Message-ID: <332@lawnet.LawNet.Com>
Date: 25 Oct 89 05:43:37 GMT
References: <331@lawnet.LawNet.Com> <1989Oct20.072121.16743@rpi.edu>
Reply-To: greg@.LawNet.Com (Gregory G. Petersen)
Organization: LawNet Inc.  California Offices.
Lines: 21

In article <1989Oct20.072121.16743@rpi.edu> tale@pawl.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence) writes:
>So, his clarinet samples are in biz.  If anything, this should be the
>one hierarchy that he could have chosen which wouldn't draw any fire.
>If you don't want it, fine.  Go ahead and remove it.  What exactly
>_is_ your problem here?  Why do you get the biz hierarchy at all if
>you can't deal with the inherent commercialism of it?
>
>Dave
>-- 
> (setq mail '("tale@pawl.rpi.edu" "tale@itsgw.rpi.edu" "tale@rpitsmts.bitnet"))



Apparently you didn't get the create newsgroup message that was sent out
which, as I understood the situation required a vote. Moreover, I frankly
don't get "biz" - which was the point of the posting. Since I don't why is
brad@looking approving groups outside "biz" and sending them. As I now
understand in email responses he was trying to do a service about the 
earthquake - or so I am told (ca.earthquake seems to serve the purpose
as well) albeit the email was the first I heard of that (and I will leave
my views of the merits out of it).