Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!stat!vsserv!prism!ccsupos From: ccsupos@prism.gatech.EDU (SCHREIBER, O. A.) Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle Subject: Re: shuttle escape systems Message-ID: <2522@hydra.gatech.EDU> Date: 14 Oct 89 23:06:18 GMT References: <538.252A3A3B@mamab.FIDONET.ORG> <2430@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1989Oct12.021826.7915@utzoo.uucp> <2521@hydra.gatech.EDU> Reply-To: ccsupos@prism.gatech.EDU (SCHREIBER, O. A.) Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology Lines: 24 In article <2521@hydra.gatech.EDU> ccsupos@prism.gatech.EDU (SCHREIBER, O. A.) writes: > >>How much risk FOR WHAT GAIN is the question. If *you* want to stay on the >>ground, nobody is going to march you on at gunpoint. uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu If you think that a 2.5 year delay in manned space operations is a GAIN, then of course the risk is ok. Still, NASA may not want in the future >to take the responsibility of sending non astronauts with that kind -- Olivier Schreiber (404)894 6147, Office of Computing Services Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332 uucp: ...!{allegra,amd,hplabs,seismo,ut-ngp}!gatech!prism!ccsupos ARPA: ccsupos@prism.gatech.edu