Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!uci-ics!tittle
From: keith@pawl.rpi.EDU (Keith D. Weiner)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: Feminism is a fine word, thank you
Message-ID: <1989Oct15.234516.411@rpi.edu>
Date: 17 Oct 89 19:49:18 GMT
References: <1880@convex.UUCP> <851@uvaarpa.virginia.edu> <4504@ncar.ucar.edu> <2637@hp-sdd.hp.com> <4525@ncar.ucar.edu> <2766@tymix.UUCP> <4537@ncar.ucar.edu> <4014@unix.SRI.COM> <RBERLIN.89Sep29230303@birdland.sun.com> <58903@aerospace.AERO.ORG>
Sender: tittle@ics.uci.edu (Cindy Tittle)
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Lines: 7
Approved: tittle@ics.uci.edu

>I can't say that I see a solution to the dilemma, given
>things as they are.

Why does the "solution" hinted at inevitably involves more laws
(backed up by a loaded gun)? Why is not freedom to spend your own
money (hire as you see fit) an answer? What is this collective "social
phenomenon" which eludes definition?