Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian From: palosaari@tiger.oxy.edu (Jedidiah Jon Palosaari) Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian Subject: re: evolution book Message-ID: Date: 16 Oct 89 04:24:10 GMT Sender: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu Organization: Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041 Lines: 8 Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.edu A member of the net speaks of having not yet read the book *Evolution, A Theory in Crises, but saying that it has "alot of out-of-context quotes from workers in the evolutionary field". I'd like to suggest that we must understand what we're fighting against before we can fight it; that it isn't necessarily wise to assume that a particular work has certain fallacies until you've read it. Speaking as one who was on the talk.origins net for a while, assumptions is exactly what makes those on the talk.origins net (mostly evolutionists) angriest- they