Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!philapd!ssp1!roelof From: roelof@idca.tds.PHILIPS.nl (R. Vuurboom) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: specmarks Summary: specmarks published Message-ID: <327@ssp1.idca.tds.philips.nl> Date: 23 Oct 89 10:38:37 GMT Organization: Philips Telecommunication and Data Systems, The Netherlands Lines: 43 A trade rag here in holland announced that spec (system performance evaluation cooperative) has published some benchmark results (so where are they, Mashey? :-). These were the figures it gave: Machine Processor Clock(Mhz) Time(sec) Specmark Mips M/2000 R3000 25 235.0 16.5 Moto 8864DP 88100(2x) 20 511,8 15.1 Apollo DN10000 Prism 18.2 267.0 14.5 Sun Sparc 330 CYC7C601? 25 343.7 11.3 Mips M/120-5 R2000 16.67 345.3 11.2 Decstation 3100 R2000 16.67 381.4 10.1 HP9000 834 PA-RISC 15 408.0 9.5 Mips RC2030 R2000 16.67 417.6 9.3 Sun Sparc I MB86901? 20 468.5 8.3 Moto 8864SP 88100 20 473,3 8.2 Moto 8608 88100 20 496.5 7.8 Decstation 2100 R2000 12.5 518.7 7.5 HP9000 370 68030 33 980.3 3.0 HP9000 340 68030 16.67 2432.4 1.6 Vax 11/780 1.0 The rag also said that the first version of the benchmarks consisted of about 10 C and Fortran programs that measured integer and floating point perfomance. Future benchmarks would measure other aspects of applications such as the performance of disks, graphics and networking. Furthermore, benchmarks were in preparation for measurement of system performance in multi-user and networked environments. No mention was made of whether or not floating point coprocessors were used where applicable. Also note that the anomalous value of the 8864DP (511,15.1) has to do with a dual processor implementation. Ok, guys 'n gals, start analyzing...:-) -- Artificial Intelligence: When computers start selling stocks because its Friday the 13th.... Roelof Vuurboom SSP/V3 Philips TDS Apeldoorn, The Netherlands +31 55 432226 domain: roelof@idca.tds.philips.nl uucp: ...!mcvax!philapd!roelof