Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!pollux!attctc!vector!telecom-gateway From: gtephx!phobos!ellisond@asuvax.EAS.ASU.EDU (Dell Ellison) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: California Junk Fax Bill Message-ID: Date: 25 Oct 89 16:05:17 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Organization: gte Lines: 14 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 472, message 9 of 10 In article , john@zygot.ati.com (John Higdon) writes: > If you support legislation against junk fax, then I would assume that > our elected representatives are already aware of the problem, their > fax machines being overrun with unsolicited advertisements. > What I'm trying to say is that either there is a problem or there > isn't. If there is, you don't need to create a situation with faxing > campaigns. If there isn't, then those who are so concerned with junk > fax need to get a life and move on. What if the problem of junk fax is wide-spread, BUT the 'elected representatives' just happen to not have the problem???