Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!wuarchive!wugate!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcam!system!mike
From: mike@system.Cambridge.NCR.COM (mike)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: Opinion poll -- Is there too much GNU in comp.emacs (was Re: Gnu + other emacs)
Message-ID: <542@system.Cambridge.NCR.COM>
Date: 30 Oct 89 12:20:32 GMT
References: <1777@onion.reading.ac.uk> <117@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM>
Reply-To: mike@system.Cambridge.NCR.COM ()
Organization: NCR Corporation, E&M Cambridge, Ohio
Lines: 26

In article <117@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM> baur@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM (Steven L. Baur) writes:
>
>O.K.   We've heard several sides.  I personally care about only GNU emacs,
>and I don't mind cross posting with the GNU hierarchy because I remember
>what it was like before our site received it.  If you don't like the way
>things are, then here's your chance to do something about it.
>
>I am conducting an opinion poll that will last until midnight November
>11.
>
>1)  Are you interested in splitting up comp.emacs?  (Yes/No)
>	If yes, include how you would split it up *and* what group names
>	there should be.


no ! No !! NO !!!  Please Don't split this stuff up. I used to read all of
the emacs groups but it was too much !!!  I use mg, GNUemacs, and microemacs
on several different machines at various times.  This group covers enough
of everything so that I can keep informed.

On a related note, my mg is rather old ... can someone send me the latest.
I have mg2a and today IN THIS GROUP saw someone metion mg3a.

thanks

mike