Xref: utzoo comp.std.c:1917 comp.lang.c:23128
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!gatech!udel!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: commom malloc/free practice breaks standard - author strikes back
Message-ID: <11380@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 22 Oct 89 09:47:32 GMT
References: <1989Oct16.111059.3840@anucsd.oz> <416@cpsolv.UUCP> <11334@smoke.BRL.MIL> <420@cpsolv.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn)
Followup-To: comp.std.c
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 8

In article <420@cpsolv.UUCP> rhg@cpsolv.uucp (Richard H. Gumpertz) writes:
>Please tell me what section I have overlooked or stop saying
>the standard already has things that I cannot find.

If you've been following this thread, you should have already seen
the answers to your questions.

I *know* the Standard has things you cannot find.