Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bfmny0!tneff
From: tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: PL/I Grammar
Keywords: PL/I, C, grammar, parser
Message-ID: <14784@bfmny0.UU.NET>
Date: 23 Oct 89 16:26:44 GMT
References: <2956@usceast.UUCP> <1989Oct18.012237.548@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> <464eadaa.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM> <33398@cornell.UUCP> <10986@riks.csl.sony.co.jp>
Reply-To: tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff)
Organization: ^
Lines: 16
Summary:
Expires:
Sender:
Followup-To:

In article <10986@riks.csl.sony.co.jp> diamond@ws.sony.junet (Norman Diamond) writes:
>In article <33398@cornell.UUCP> bard@cs.cornell.edu (Bard Bloom) writes:
>
>>IF IF = THEN THEN THEN = ELSE ELSE ELSE = IF
>>
>>only in PL/I...  (I hope)
>
>Only by an idiot in PL/I.  ...

Where are all these sentiments when the Obfuscated C Contest rolls
around, I wonder?  Does C have a monopoly on FUN in programming?? :-)

-- 
"We must never forget that if the war in Vietnam    \ $   Tom Neff
is lost... the right of free speech will be          X    tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET
extinguished throughout the world." -- RN 10/27/65  $ \   uunet!bfmny0!tneff