Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!cimshop!davidm From: cimshop!davidm@uunet.UU.NET (David S. Masterson) Newsgroups: comp.object Subject: Re: Persistent Objects Was: Re: Pre-computing objects Message-ID: Date: 30 Oct 89 17:57:29 GMT References: <4671be53.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM> <4908@internal.Apple.COM> <1852@eric.mpr.ca> Sender: davidm@cimshop.UUCP Organization: Consilium Inc., Mountain View, California. Lines: 17 In-reply-to: ssmith@joplin.mpr.ca's message of 27 Oct 89 18:19:42 GMT In article <1852@eric.mpr.ca> ssmith@joplin.mpr.ca (Shaun Smith) writes: Since a discussion of persistent objects has sprung up I thought I'd bring up the REKURSIV chip set (VME board/computer) again. Having only seen REKURSIV mentioned in the above message, it does sound interesting, but sounds like it is too object-oriented (if that makes sense). The hard part of today's object-orientation is how it will interface to the non-object-oriented world. REKURSIV seems to make the assumption that everyone dealing with persistent information is object-oriented. -- =================================================================== David Masterson Consilium, Inc. uunet!cimshop!davidm Mt. View, CA 94043 =================================================================== "Nobody here but us chickens..."