Xref: utzoo comp.os.minix:7703 comp.sys.ibm.pc:37085 comp.unix.xenix:8257
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!mit-eddie!bbn!oliveb!tymix!cirrusl!sun505!dhesi
From: dhesi@sun505.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: dosread.c again
Message-ID: <1005@cirrusl.UUCP>
Date: 27 Oct 89 04:54:09 GMT
References: <3717@ast.cs.vu.nl> <3a18.2536ede8@ibmpcug.co.uk> <3721@ast.cs.vu.nl> <2501@optilink.UUCP> <1989Oct20.170447.19573@utzoo.uucp>
Sender: news@cirrusl.UUCP
Reply-To: dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com (Rahul Dhesi)
Organization: Cirrus Logic Inc.
Lines: 12

In article <1989Oct20.170447.19573@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry
Spencer) writes:
>Hatred of DOS is entirely rational, and has nothing to do with who else
>uses it.  There are ample reasons to despise that feeble excuse for an
>operating system.

That depends on the particular DOS, you know.  UNIX, for example, is a
pretty decent DOS.

Rahul Dhesi <dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com>
UUCP:  oliveb!cirrusl!dhesi
Use above addresses--email sent here via Sun.com will probably bounce.