Xref: utzoo comp.os.minix:7750 comp.sys.ibm.pc:37276 comp.unix.xenix:8317 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!ginosko!uunet!ficc!korenek From: korenek@ficc.uu.net (Gary Korenek) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: IBM and Apple Operating Systems (Re: dosread.c again) Summary: so why didn't some other company fill the void? Message-ID: <6731@ficc.uu.net> Date: 30 Oct 89 20:02:48 GMT References: <6661@ficc.uu.net> <10609@cbnews.ATT.COM> <143@asihub.UUCP> <6724@ficc.uu.net> Organization: Ferranti Int'l Controls Lines: 34 In article <6724@ficc.uu.net>, peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes: > In article <6723@ficc.uu.net> korenek@ficc.uu.net (Gary Korenek) writes: > > 8. The point to all this: companies take massive gambles with new > > products. If it had not been for the original IBM-PC and MS-DOS, > > we would not even have what we have today. > > No, we'd have something based on Concurrent CP/M, OS/9, SOS, or some other > decent DOS of that period. We'd have something better. So why hasn't something better than MS-DOS been developed despite MS-DOS? I say it's because other companies waited to see if the IBM-PC and MS-DOS would live or die (thus letting IBM and MS take the big risk). Lo-and behold, it lived! By the the time MS-DOS took hold it was too late to go against it. BTW I'd like a multi-tasking O.S. (like UNIX), a VGA-quality color display, a 100-meg. hard disk, a user interface like the Apple Macintosh, a throughput of a 33-MHz memory-and-disk cached 386 system, at a price that an "ordinary guy" can afford ($2000 is my threshold of pain). Also there must be an infinite ;^) supply of software available. I should not have to hold degrees in Electrical and Software Engineering to be able to configure and use the machine. I should not have to spend hours showing my wife "the ropes" so she can enter a letter, format it, and print it. If I run a Flight Simulator game it should be like I'm flying the plane, not like I'm sitting at a PC playing a game. The next breakthrough in personal computers (hardware, o.s.es, and applications software) will be the introduction of systems like I describe above at a price that is more reasonable than 5 or 10K. I'm waiting... -- Gary Korenek (korenek@ficc.uu.net) | This space Ferranti International Controls Corp. | intentionally Sugar Land, Texas (713)274-5357 | left blank