Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!BOOLE.ECE.CMU.EDU!Gene.Hastings
From: Gene.Hastings@BOOLE.ECE.CMU.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Router interoperability
Message-ID: <1989.10.24.16.57.48.Gene.Hastings@boole>
Date: 24 Oct 89 17:00:12 GMT
References: <8910241346.AA21092@iapetus.rice.edu>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 8

Bear in mind a potential gotcha: Once the router vendors support PPP, there
is still the potential for disagreement about the encapsulation of other
protocols (such as D*CN*T), and some of us need to support multiprotocol
routers.

Would any of the router vendors like to respond?

Gene