Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!wugate!uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen
From: davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.COM (Wm E Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: null pointers [joke?]
Message-ID: <1518@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Date: 30 Oct 89 15:28:32 GMT
References: <11380@smoke.BRL.MIL> <8952@goofy.megatest.UUCP> <876.2549cbb7@csc.anu.oz>
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Organization: GE Corp R&D Center
Lines: 13

In article <876.2549cbb7@csc.anu.oz>, bdm659@csc.anu.oz writes:
|  However, it turns out that I'M WRONG TOO, for another reason.
|  Merv Rubinstein informs me that in the draft of Dec. 7 1988 it says
|  
|          "If two pointers to object or incomplete
|           types are both null, they compare equal."

  Another case of "no substantive changes," right?
-- 
bill davidsen	(davidsen@crdos1.crd.GE.COM -or- uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen)
"The world is filled with fools. They blindly follow their so-called
'reason' in the face of the church and common sense. Any fool can see
that the world is flat!" - anon