Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: null pointers [joke?]
Message-ID: <11446@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 31 Oct 89 03:10:16 GMT
References: <11380@smoke.BRL.MIL> <8952@goofy.megatest.UUCP> <876.2549cbb7@csc.anu.oz> <1518@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 7

In article <1518@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes:
>|          "If two pointers to object or incomplete
>|           types are both null, they compare equal."
>  Another case of "no substantive changes," right?

Right.  Or do you want to argue that X3J11 ever intended that
	(int*)0 != (int*)0