Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!madnix!perry
From: perry@madnix.UUCP (Perry Kivolowitz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Should I go commercial?
Keywords: DME editors
Message-ID: <953@madnix.UUCP>
Date: 28 Oct 89 02:52:54 GMT
References: <8910240722.AA22726@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> <11884@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com> <20170@ut-emx.UUCP>
Reply-To: perry@madnix.UUCP (Perry Kivolowitz)
Organization: ASDG Incorporated
Lines: 16

In article <20170@ut-emx.UUCP> hcobb@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Henry J. Cobb) writes:
>	I have this ideal of an editor:

For the most part you just described CygnusEd Professional. In release 1
ced itself was rarely invoked directly (or rather, shouldn't have been).
Instead a 1K program called ``ed'' is invoked. In release 2, there's even
less of a reason to ever invoke ced directly.

pk

(p.s. yes yes, release 2 is coming...)

-- 
Perry Kivolowitz, ASDG Inc. ``We look for things. Things that make us go.''
	UUCP:  {harvard|rutgers|ucbvax}!uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!madnix!perry
	CIS:   76004,1765 PLINK: pk-asdg