Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!hellgate.utah.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!mucs!els!dente From: dente@els.uucp (Colin Dente) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo Subject: Re: Apollo NFS V2.0 Message-ID: <292@m1.cs.man.ac.uk> Date: 23 Oct 89 17:40:42 GMT References: <7847@charlie.OZ> <238@ticipa.ti.com> <758@idacom.UUCP> Sender: news@cs.man.ac.uk Reply-To: dente@els.ee.man.ac.uk (Colin Dente) Organization: University of Manchester, UK Lines: 63 In article <758@idacom.UUCP> danny@idacom.UUCP (Danny Wilson) writes: > >[Description of NFS set up at IDACOM] > > node A /O\ nfsd, mountd Node A and B are > / \ DN3000's with 4Mb RAM > | | Token Ring > \ / > node B \O/ > | Ethernet > -------------+----------------------------- > >To realize this, we run the NFS servers on a node one the ring _different_ >from the gateway node to the Ethernet (which connects to some Suns and a >Vax) > >However, it we always get timeouts when trying to access DOMAIN files >from one of the Suns. I could guess that the nfsd gets paged out when >there is no activity (after you _do_ get into the directory, the response >time seems normal). We have changed the mount command so that >there are lots retries etc. > >Has anyone configured like this and did it work? Sorry for the big quote - but it all seems relevant. We have a similar configuration - except we are running the NFS stuff on the gateway node (DN3010, 4Mb, 10.1) (+ we have a few more nodes on the token ring), and response is *AWFUL*. Accessing domain files from a Sun on the same piece of ethernet as the Apollo will often result in many timeouts - (that is, the Sun says 'NFS server not responding' followed a few seconds later by 'NFS server OK'. Typically, you might expect 20 timeouts when shifting 5Mbytes of data across via NFS. In another building, I have a very similar setup, but with a DN590-T (12Mb, ETH802.3_VME interface, 10.1) as the gateway - this behaves similarly, except the NFS server on that often goes away for ever (well, until I get bored - i.e. >1 hour). In both cases the ethernet is very lightly used - peak load is about 10%, average 2-3%. I'm told that you have to patch the ethernet8_microcode on pre SR10.2 releases of the OS, but surely this only applies to the AT bus machines? or am I wrong there? - anyway - I'm waiting for the relevant patch. As a matter of interest, I had exactly the same situation with NFS V1.0 running on a DSP80A (3Mb, SR9.7.1, COM-ECMB) - I just put it down to crap hardware - seems I was unfairly demeaning the poor little bugger. Has anyone found these problems? - or a cure? - will patching the ethernet8_microcode solve my troubles? - will we all live happily ever after? - help????!!!! Colin Dente | JANET: dente@uk.ac.man.ee.els Dept. of Electrical Engineering | ARPA: dente@els.ee.man.ac.uk University of Manchester | UUCP: ...!mcvax!ukc!man.ee.els!dente England | These might work now, but then again...