Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!uwm.edu!marque!carroll1!dnewton From: dnewton@carroll1.UUCP (Dave 'C is cool, but what about LOGO?' Newton) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: TT's, flames, etc Message-ID: <790@carroll1.UUCP> Date: 26 Oct 89 01:06:33 GMT References: <2161@hudson.acc.virginia.edu> <4167@blake.acs.washington.edu> <3979.25443723@uwovax.uwo.ca> Reply-To: dnewton@carroll1.UUCP (Dave 'C is cool, but what about LOGO?' Newton) Organization: Organization? We don't need no steenkin' organization. Lines: 24 In article <3979.25443723@uwovax.uwo.ca> 4224_5132@uwovax.uwo.ca (Andrew Semple) writes: > All I ask for is that we give Atari as many fair chances as possible. If >Atari goes down in flames, it is because of bad management and no support >from the public. If the public supports, the bad management usually works >out. If the public doesn't support, bye bye Atari, bye bye new ideas, >bye bye change.... BZZZZ! Wrong. The people that have Atari's _DO_ support them, this is the _only_ reason they are here. That _DOES NOT_ insure Atari's continued semi- success in the States. Third party support, _AD CAMPAIGN'S_ would _really_ help a _lot_, maybe even some product announcements from Atari that were true (btw, good job on the PC hand-held and the Lynx (if we see it), even though I don't want one, ya' done good) like the TT, or the Transputer workstation. Someone complained about the TT being less-than-advanced, but really, little is these days. I think it's a step in the right direction if it ever gets out and into _our_ hands. Oh well, enough underlines for a day. -- David L. Newton | uunet!marque!carroll1!dnewton | The Raging Apostle-- (414) 524-7343 (work) | dnewton@carroll1.cc.edu | for the future-- (414) 524-6809 (home) | 100 NE Ave, Waukesha WI 53186 | for the world. "Isn't it fun to take two unrelated sentences and mix the batter lightly?" -me