Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!eb2e+
From: eb2e+@andrew.cmu.edu (Eric James Bales)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: RLL controllers with MFM drives
Message-ID: <QZFFnjq00VcIA7b6gY@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 25 Oct 89 02:39:43 GMT
References: <none> <2546@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu> <4265@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> <35883@srcsip.UUCP> <4273@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu>,
	<3544@orion.cf.uci.edu>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 14
In-Reply-To: <3544@orion.cf.uci.edu>


  All of this talk about the ST225's and 238's not being very 
good at RLL format has made me wonder about my drive.  I 
swapped the 20 Meg in my PS/2 Model 30 for a ST138R when I 
bought the computer used about eight months ago.  Does the
ST138 (3.5 inch model of 238) have as much trouble as the 
ST238?  I am formatting(sp?) the drive RLL.
 
                                               -Eric Kirkbride-
                                                Carnegie Mellon
Disclaimer: Who, in their right mind, would believe me?!?
 
"I have a firm belief that all computers are the children of 
Satan...", Shannon Cline