Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!hplabs!hpfcso!hpldola!hp-lsd!oldcolo!weekley
From: weekley@oldcolo.UUCP (Bob Weekley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Re^2: Word Processor
Message-ID: <[1637.4]ibmpc;1@oldcolo.UUCP>
Date: 23 Oct 89 12:10:05 GMT
References: <1989Oct7.195022.9535@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> <89Oct13.104618edt.10808
Lines: 18

>drv@cbnewsj.ATT.COM (dennis.r.vogel) writes:

>>.........  Without rehashing the Word/WP comparison, which of the
>>two would be better on a Toshiba T1000 laptop without a mouse and
>>without a hard disk or the RAM card?

Well, the granddaddy of tham all WORDSTAR was specifically designed to
run in a limited memory environment, and does it very well.
(This is the original, but tuned up, version; NOT WS-5, I'm speaking of.)
----------------------
Robert R. Weekley @ oldcolo.UUCP  
                             THE OLD COLORADO CITY ELECTRONIC COTTAGE
      | Standard |          2502 W. Colorado Ave. #203; C.S., CO 80904
      |Disclaimer|           (719) 632-3391 [8-N-1]; 632-4848 [voice]

   "Freedom is the opportunity for self dicipline" -Dwight D. Eisenhower
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-