Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:37284 alt.msdos.programmer:603
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!hp0p+
From: hp0p+@andrew.cmu.edu (Hokkun Pang)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,alt.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: Turbo C far pointers
Message-ID: <wZHEDrW00VoH479lIM@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 31 Oct 89 02:31:19 GMT
Organization: Class of '92, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 6

>  2)  You really should use "ptr[i]" rather than "*(ptr+i)".  It effectively
>      does the same thing, but it makes for much cleaner and much more
>      readable code.

I read from a book that "ptr[i]" will be converted to "*(ptr+i)" by the
compiler, so the "*(ptr+1)" is faster than "ptr[1]". Is that right?