Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uwvax!tank!eecae!cps3xx!cpsvax!smithda From: smithda@cpsvax.cps.msu.edu (J. Daniel Smith) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: TeX/LaTeX are not stagnant! (was Re: Help me defend LaTeX) Keywords: TeX, LaTeX, technical writing Message-ID: <5105@cps3xx.UUCP> Date: 25 Oct 89 02:22:25 GMT References: <1762@naucse.UUCP> <71781@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <2601@jarthur.Claremont.EDU> Sender: usenet@cps3xx.UUCP Reply-To: smithda@cpsvax.UUCP (J. Daniel Smith) Organization: Michigan State University, Computer Science Department Lines: 23 In article <2601@jarthur.Claremont.EDU> dhosek@jarthur.UUCP (D.A. Hosek) writes: >In article <71781@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> Gary Perlman writes: >> while systems like troff and TeX, which have a far smaller market, >>are stangnant. > >Actually, TeX and LaTeX are not stagnant; Don Knuth announced at the TUG >meeting that he would be making some rather dramatic changes to TeX (TeX 3.0 >is currently in alpha test, and the 17th printing of the TeXbook will Any insights as to what kind of "dramatic changes to TeX" will be made? I thought TeX "frozen" and that changes would no longer be made. This is the first I've heard of this....does anyone have any more details???? Dan ========================================================================= J. Daniel Smith Internet: smithda@cpsvax.cps.msu.edu Michigan State University BITNET: smithdan@msuegr Usenet: uunet!frith!smithda I can only assume that a "Do Not File" document is filed in a "Do Not File" file. - Senator Frank Church =========================================================================