Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!sun-barr!ames!amelia!pioneer.arc.nasa.gov!samlb From: samlb@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov (Sam Bassett RCD) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: Pronunciations (was: And how do you pronounce "csh"?) Message-ID: <3617@amelia.nas.nasa.gov> Date: 29 Oct 89 05:27:08 GMT References: <0400.AA0400@dcpc> <2556@munnari.oz.au> Sender: news@amelia.nas.nasa.gov Reply-To: samlb@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov (Sam Bassett RCD) Followup-To: sci.lang Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Mtn Vw CA 94035 Lines: 47 In article <2556@munnari.oz.au> ok@cs.mu.oz.au (Richard O'Keefe) writes: >In article <0400.AA0400@dcpc>, dc@dcpc.UUCP (Don Curtis) writes: >> The one I want to know is how most folks pronounce "char", >> I and most others pronounce it like the first part of >> "character" while others pronounce it like the first >> part of "charcoal" >(The first syllable of "character" does __not__ sound like "care".) It may not in Australia, but in the U.S. it does -- the syllabification is char-ac-ter, pronounced k@r ak t@r (@ = 'schwa') >It's worth pointing out that most of the abbreviated keywords in C ('char' >is not a UNIX command, it's a C keyword) are not the first syllables of >their words or not a whole number of syllables of their words. > struc-ture Common U.S. pronunciation is 'strukchur'; over-careful, pedant pronunciation is 'strukt'yuhr'. > in-te-ger Nope -- 'int-eh-g@r' > (type)de-fine I'll buy this pronunciation for 'define', but the word he was thinking of is pronounced 'def-uh-ni-shun'. > ex-ter-nal Yup -- but I'll bet he didn't want a digraph, and so used a trigraph. > e-nu-mer-ate Nope -- it's 'ee-noom-*rate' in the U.S. (* sometimes a schwa). > con-stant Not in the U.S. -- the only thing we pronounce that way is 'Constantinople'. The most common pronunciation is 'kons-tant'. Sam'l Bassett, Sterling Software @ NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field CA 94035 Work: (415) 694-4792; Home: (415) 969-2644 samlb@well.sf.ca.us samlb@ames.arc.nasa.gov := 'Sterling doesn't _have_ opinions -- much less NASA!'