Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!purdue!bu-cs!mirror!frog!john
From: john@frog.UUCP (John Woods)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: is it recreational or technical ?
Summary: is it a salad dressing or a foot ointment?
Message-ID: <2173@frog.UUCP>
Date: 25 Oct 89 03:43:00 GMT
References: <21042@gryphon.COM> <2952@splut.conmicro.com> <21076@gryphon.COM> <3757@pinas.cs.vu.nl>
Organization: Misanthropes-R-Us
Lines: 11

In article <3757@pinas.cs.vu.nl>, maart@cs.vu.nl (Maarten Litmaath) writes:
> richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton) writes:
> \I believe that technical
> \groups in rec as as misplaced as .philosophy is in sci.
> 
> Philosophy can be studied at universities: it is considered a science.

Oh?  What does current theory say about the results of accelerating a
philosopher to 26TeV and slamming him into a brick wall target?

I hereby propose we rename news.groups to alt.flame.groups.