Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!apple!agate!usenet
From: gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: .aquaria
Message-ID: <1989Oct26.044435.23101@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 26 Oct 89 04:44:35 GMT
References: <21442@gryphon.COM>
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44)
Reply-To: gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith)
Organization: Garnet Gang Gems of Wisdom, Inc.
Lines: 31
In-reply-to: richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton)

In article <21442@gryphon.COM>, richard@gryphon (Richard Sexton) writes:
>In article <1989Oct24.050816.9206@agate.berkeley.edu> gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith) writes:
>>  In the only poll I saw posted, sci.aquaria lost.

>``You LIE!!'' - Tim Maroney

>Sorry couldn't resist.

>Nelsons survey was posted to news.groups and alt.aquaria.

>Since you missed it the first time, Gene:
>>rec.aquarium                   5
>>rec.aquaria                   11
>>sci.aquaria                   16
>>rec.fish                       1
>>rec.aquariums                  1

  You've been hanging around with fish too long, Richard. I've
heard crows can count to five, maybe you should take up
birdwatching instead. Look at the above. Count the numbers: those
who wanted sci.something: 16 out of 34, or 47%. Those who wanted
rec.something: 18 out of 34, or 53%. I guess fisheadology isn't
very big on mathematical models, though we all know how
scientific it is.  Really, we do.

  In other words, YOU LIE!!! Sci.aquaria *lost*.
--
'Still, if you were at Brahms and the room flashed as another idea was
captured from the ebb and flow of that vast sea of cosmic intelligence,
the idea might be considered to have been "created"' --  Paul M. Koloc
ucbvax!garnet!gsmith     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720