Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!lsefton
From: lsefton@Apple.COM (Laurie Sefton)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: new low for Sexton on sci.aquaria
Keywords: sexist pig
Message-ID: <35995@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: 28 Oct 89 02:46:51 GMT
Organization: Clan Chattan
Lines: 50

I voted on sci.aquaria, and this is what I received in response:

From gryphon!richard@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov Fri Oct 27 16:53:17 1989
Received: from elroy.jpl.nasa.gov by apple.com (5.59/25-eef)
	id AA29600; Fri, 27 Oct 89 16:53:12 PDT
	for lsefton
Received: from gryphon.UUCP by elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0+DXR)
	id AA01186; Fri, 27 Oct 89 16:06:36 PDT
Received: by gryphon.COM (smail2.5)
	id AA20567; 27 Oct 89 10:47:46 PDT (Fri)
To: elroy!apple.com!lsefton@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov
Subject: sci.aquaria
Date: Fri Oct 27 10:47:43 1989
Message-Id: <8910271047.AA20567@gryphon.COM>
From: richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton)
Status: R

Now why would you want to vote no ? Is this you chuq ?


I've received and recorded your no vote.

Could you please look at an article I posted in alt.aquaria,
sci.misc, sci.bio and news.groups wich I feel makes a
compelling argument for sci.aquaria as an adjunct to, 
not a replacement for, rec.aquaria.

It's entitled ``a bunch of stuff'' and has article ID 21387@gryphon.COM

Regards, 
Richard Sexton

***********************

Well, Mr. Sexton you *are* the sexist pig, aren't you? Or do you think that
Chuq would forge votes? I can damn well think on my own, and as for your
information, as if that syphilitic wad of scum you call your brain could
even register information, I think that sci.aquaria is a incredibly stupid
idea.

Are you discounting *all* the no votes that come from women? Poor little
things just don't know what they're talking about, huh? Need the big strong
men to tell them how to vote, huh?

You're a chauvinist slug, Mr. Sexton.

Laurie Sefton
-- 
lsefton@apple.com {amdahl,sun,ames,pyramid}!apple!lsefton
disclaimer: My views, not Apple's