Xref: utzoo talk.politics.guns:4398 soc.men:14720 news.groups:13777
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!pprg.unm.edu!topgun.dspo.gov!sorsby
From: sorsby@DSPO.GOV (Charlie Sorsby)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,soc.men,news.groups
Subject: Re: talk.politics.guns not serving its intended purpose?
Summary: Proper newsgroups.
Message-ID: <2149@topgun.dspo.gov>
Date: 30 Oct 89 17:30:10 GMT
References: <biilllyuns and biilllyuns> <1270@uvaarpa.virginia.edu> <248@flash.UUCP>
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 24

In article <248@flash.UUCP>, bill@flash.UUCP (William Swan) writes:
> In article <4860@ncar.ucar.edu> gary@cgdisis.ucar.edu (Gary Strand) writes:
> }gs: Ed, ...  Let's take this to talk.politics.guns ...
[..]
> }  Believe me, I've tried at least 3 or 4 times to get this re-directed to
> }  t.p.g. Ed is recalcitrant,
[...]
> Sounds like talk.politics.guns isn't serving its (stated) purpose if 
> those arguing one side of the issue refuse to carry on the discussion
> in the appropriate group.

Or, perhaps, there are those who prefer to bleat in newgroups where
fewer people know about the issues?

It is much more difficult to make a point where, not only is there
opposition to the premise, but where there are many who know why
the premise is bogus.

Best,

Charlie Sorsby						"I'm the NRA!"
	crs@lambda.lanl.gov
	sorsby@dspo.gov
	sorsby@pprg.unm.edu