Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!GAFFA.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
From: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: A few initial TSW comments after a week
Message-ID: <8910241752.AA01136@phaeo.nada.kth.se>
Date: 24 Oct 89 17:52:26 GMT
References: <8910241524.AA29991@clutx.clarkson.edu>
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Lines: 23
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu

Really-From: nv89-pyl@nada.kth.se (Patrik Yle'n)

>>Will people stop comparing TSW to HoL or TD!?!?!?!? It's a completely
>>different album and should not be "measured" against other works,
>>either KT's or other artists. Look at it for what it is and if then
>>it doesn't do anything for you, you can flame it, but don't say
>>that isn't worth it just because it isn't on the level of earlier
>>works.



Why not compare albums then? I agree with you that TSW has nothing
whatsoever to do with HOL or TD, but I can't see anything wrong
with comparing them. I also agree with whoever it was that said
(I think it was Ed.) that making a poll about Kate-records really
isn't worth much, but why not? I believe most people like charts,
otherwise there wouldn't be any reason for having them around, would
there? 




nv89-pyl@nada.kth.se (Patrik Yle'n)