Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!GAFFA.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
From: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Interview-transcribing
Message-ID: <8910252358.AA13557@GAFFA.MIT.EDU>
Date: 25 Oct 89 22:50:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 32
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu

Really-From: IED0DXM%OAC.UCLA.EDU@mitvma.mit.edu


 To: Love-Hounds
 From: Andrew Marvick (IED)
 Subject: Interview-transcribing

     IED would like to make sure that no more than one Love-Hound
will be transcribing a given interview. He is _extremely_ appreciative
of the efforts being made by Neil Calton (whose latest contribution
to the group was the _You_ Magazine interview) and Steve Wallis
(for whom we are all indebted for the ongoing transcription of the
very long Radio 1 interview); as well as others who have been sending
in various reviews of the new album.
     IED, who recently posted the _NME_ interview, hereby pledges
to transcribe the quite long _Q_ Magazine interview, which he just
obtained today. It will not appear in Love-Hounds for a couple of
days, because it will take several hours to copy out, and it really
is better read at one sitting. (It's an _excellent_ interview.)
     After he has posted the _Q_ interview, IED will tackle Steve
Sutherland's recent _Melody_Maker_ interview (recently described in
glowing colours by Ed Suranyi, not without some reason, though IED's
reaction was a bit more cynical, as might have been predicted), unless
someone else has already done so by that time.
     Altogether, Love-Hounds is becoming the ultimate center for KT
news, interviews, reviews, and original Bushological ideas. We are
presently outshining all other KT-related organs in all these areas.
So tell your friends, tell your local DJ, tell your neighbours, tell your
local record-store owners: Love-Hounds is where the aKTion is!

-- Andrew Marvick
   ("Can't we see?")