Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!ginosko!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!GAFFA.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request From: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa Subject: Male vs. Female Message-ID: <8910261928.AA14946@clutx.clarkson.edu> Date: 26 Oct 89 19:28:56 GMT Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU Reply-To: Love-Hounds@GAFFA.MIT.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 22 Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu Really-From: Woj Hmmm....I've been thinking...when I read one of the posted interviews (the last long one...I don't remember which one exactly), I remember remember Kate saying that TD and HoL were very male albums for her. As we all know, KT has also said that TSW is "the most feminine re- lease of hers to date. Perhaps that has a lot to do with how we have all reacted to it. I mean, most of us males have been comparing it to HoL and TD and say- ing that it doesn't live up to the old stuff, while as far as I can remember the females who post here have *loved* it. Anyone think there might be relationship between response to the album and sex? woj --- woiccare@clutx.clarkson.edu ps. As an endnote, I recently took a sex role test as part of a psychology test and came up androgynous - so I guess that means that I can like 'em all like I do!