Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!att!cbnews!military
From: sman@prandtl.nas.nasa.gov (Sekong Man)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Fuel Injection vs Carb.
Message-ID: <10619@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Date: 26 Oct 89 01:27:59 GMT
Sender: military@cbnews.ATT.COM
Organization: NASA Ames Research Center
Lines: 11
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: sman@prandtl.nas.nasa.gov (Sekong Man)

	In <10574@cbnews.ATT.COM> reference were made about the
advantages of fuel injection.

	True the original Carb could not work inverted, but Rolls-Royce
came up with quick fixes. Also the fuel injection entails a loss of
power and lower efficient. Stanley Hooker of Rolls-Royce talked about
these in his autobiography, "Not much of an Engineer".