Xref: utzoo sci.space.shuttle:3910 sci.space:14982 Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,sci.space Path: utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: Space Shuttle SRB exhaust gas makeup. Message-ID: <1989Oct25.024533.14584@utzoo.uucp> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology References: <8910231952.AA14411@decwrl.dec.com> <1989Oct24.163114.29924@utzoo.uucp> <572@milton.acs.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 89 02:45:33 GMT In article <572@milton.acs.washington.edu> stephen@milton.acs.washington.edu (Stephen Milton) writes: >>> Does it contain hydrogen oxide? >>I.e., water? Yes... > >technically, water is not hydrogen oxide, its dihydrogen oxide... No, technically water is hydrogen oxide (ref: Hdbk of Chemistry & Physics, table of inorganic compounds). It is normal to omit numeric prefixes when no ambiguity is present (e.g. N2O4 is nitrogen tetroxide, not dinitrogen tetroxide), and also common to refer to the most common or "normal" oxide of XXX as "XXX oxide" (e.g. Fe2O3 is iron oxide even though FeO also exists; if one is being fussy one uses "ferric" and "ferrous" or "iron (III)" and "iron (II)" to distinguish). Chemical nomenclature in practice is nowhere near as formalized and pedantic as it could be in theory. -- A bit of tolerance is worth a | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology megabyte of flaming. | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu