Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!iclswe!gmb
From: gmb@iclswe.UUCP (Grahame Budd)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Falcon Bug ?
Summary: Bombs away bombs out.
Message-ID: <377@iclswe.UUCP>
Date: 1 Nov 89 11:13:14 GMT
References: <1064@faatcrl.UUCP>
Reply-To: gmb@iclswe.UUCP (Grahame Budd)
Organization: ICL DATA AB  S-194 85  Upplands Vasby  SWEDEN
Lines: 7

The problem i've hit is as follows. Take off with a CAT 3 load, Mk84 bombs for 
example. Release all the CAT 3 hardware. The simulation still gives a fatal spin
stall if you invert. I don't know if this is the correct response but from the
specs of the launch rails it doesn't look right.

BTW I agree with you about the COLONEL level being easier to fly. The responses
are a lot more natural; there is however a bit of bother with the SAMs.