Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!njin!limonce From: limonce@pilot.njin.net (Tom Limoncelli) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Missing k directive Message-ID: Date: 4 Nov 89 07:41:18 GMT References: <15503@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <1105@forty2.UUCP> <1107@forty2.UUCP> Organization: Drew University/NJIN Lines: 13 [The whole "Missing K Directive" problem is covered in the monthly posting.] Is this problem due to be fixed in 1.4? Actually, I guess "fixed" isn't the right answer. More like "made more difficult to stumble on and have the documentation cover what to do a little better"? -Tom -- Tom Limoncelli -- limonce@pilot.njin.net Standard Disclaimer CM 1060 -- tlimonce@drunivac.bitnet P O Box 802 -- ...!rutgers!njin!drew!tlimonce Madison, NJ 07940 -- 201-408-5389 "I do not like green eggs and spam, I do not like them, Sam I am!"