Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!ukma!rutgers!njin!limonce From: limonce@pilot.njin.net (Tom Limoncelli) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: 24bit/pixel Keywords: IFF 24-bits truecolor Message-ID: Date: 4 Nov 89 20:29:34 GMT References: <5342@spudge.UUCP> <932@mit-amt.MEDIA.MIT.EDU> Distribution: na Organization: Drew University/NJIN Lines: 26 In article I wrote: [ discussion of 24-bit/pixel BITPLANE-interleaved IFF spec followed closely by 24-bit/pixel BIT-interleaved IFF spec. ] In article eric@topaz.rutgers.edu (Eric Lavitsky) writes: > The 24-Bit IFF standard is *not* chunky. It is rather a natural > extension of the ILBM spec to support images up to 24-bitplanes. It > was developed by ASDG - the only thing that was changed in the final Absolutely. I thought I made it clear that they are two different specs, but I guess it wasn't clear enough. I thought I had (I was answering two different questions and each was set off by a different quote. From a literary standpoint, I didn't leave enough transition between the two topics and they sounded (to some) like I meant they were the same spec. > Eric Lavitsky UUCP: ...rutgers!tstream!eric -- Tom Limoncelli -- limonce@pilot.njin.net Standard Disclaimer CM 1060 -- tlimonce@drunivac.bitnet P O Box 802 -- ...!rutgers!njin!drew!tlimonce Madison, NJ 07940 -- 201-408-5389 "I do not like green eggs and spam, I do not like them, Sam I am!"