Xref: utzoo comp.os.minix:7807 comp.sys.ibm.pc:37503 comp.unix.xenix:8380 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!lll-winken!tekbspa!optilink!cramer From: cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: IBM and Apple Operating Systems (Re: dosread.c again) Message-ID: <2577@optilink.UUCP> Date: 2 Nov 89 17:22:31 GMT References: <6661@ficc.uu.net> <10609@cbnews.ATT.COM> <143@asihub.UUCP> <6773@ficc.uu.net> Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA Lines: 38 In article <6773@ficc.uu.net>, peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes: > In article <2564@optilink.UUCP> cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes: > > In article <6724@ficc.uu.net>, peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes: # # # IBM didn't create the PC indusry. It doesn't do that any more. It looked and # # # it saw a thriving industry, and said "I want that". So it took it. # # # Short memory, Mr. da Silva? Before the IBM PC came out, there were # # Apple IIs, and CP/M boxes, and Radio Shack computers, but it was # # still a hobbyist market. # # Short memory, Mr. Cramer? The IBM-PC was priced in the same range as Altos, # Cromemco, and other low-end business computers running various advanced # versions of CP/M. It was a LOT more expensive than the Apples and Radio # Shacks. The only reason it sold was the percieved value of the IBM name. # For quite some time the only way to do anything useful with an IBM was to # stick a "Baby Blue" card (or equivalent) in and run CP/M software. # -- # `-_-' Peter da Silva