Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!torsqnt!tmsoft!masnet!f526.n250.z1.fidonet.org!wayne.ho
From: wayne.ho@f526.n250.z1.fidonet.org (wayne ho)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Can I Trust Performance Results?
Message-ID: <89110221162151@masnet.uucp>
Date: 1 Nov 89 21:57:00 GMT
Organization: Fidonet node 1:250/526
Lines: 21


 > interleaving and 0-wait because it is DEFINITELY faster
 > than Normal mode 1-wait state.
 > With the interleaving set the computer actually runs at
 > an average of 0.7
 > wait states which makes it slightly faster than 1-wait.
 
 
Hi,
    I think I may understand the what is going on now.  I think the 

interleaving allows for almost 0 wait state operation on the computer 
with RAM chips which are slower.  Because I have RAM which is fast 
enough to run 0 wait states, non-interleaved (I suppose true 0 wait 
state.. not .7 wait states) it will be faster than interleaving the 
RAM.  This is my educated guess.
 
                                        Wayne

--- ConfMail V3.31
 * Origin: MeTaStAsIo'S -`Not ready error reading drive A' (416)487-9093 (1:250/526)