Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!pyrnj!esquire!baumgart From: baumgart@esquire.dpw.com (Steve Baumgarten) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Monkey (Re: Word 4.0 fractional widths still farcical (Grumble)) Message-ID: <1535@esquire.UUCP> Date: 31 Oct 89 16:31:30 GMT References: <1082@diemen.cc.utas.oz> <35975@apple.Apple.COM> <1083@diemen.cc.utas.oz> <1088@polari.UUCP> <883@castle.ed.ac.uk> Sender: baumgart@esquire.UUCP Reply-To: baumgart@esquire.dpw.com (Steve Baumgarten) Organization: DP&W, New York, NY Lines: 20 In article <883@castle.ed.ac.uk> nick@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (Nick Rothwell) writes: >>I don't know what Microsoft is using, but I have an ancient DA called >>Monkey that does this, so it wouldn't surprise me any if Microsoft has >>the same thing. > >Probably their *only* testing procedure, given the quality of those >MicroSoft applications I've had to use.... > >In the case of Word, I bet they let it write the code as well.... Now be fair -- they don't let the monkey write the code, just design the user interface.... [ There, I feel much better now. :-) ] -- Steve Baumgarten | "New York... when civilization falls apart, Davis Polk & Wardwell | remember, we were way ahead of you." baumgart@esquire.dpw.com | cmcl2!esquire!baumgart | - David Letterman