Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!wugate!uunet!munnari.oz.au!basser!metro!bunyip!moondance!ant
From: ant@batserver.cs.uq.oz (Anthony Murdoch)
Newsgroups: sci.bio,aus.followup
Subject: Re: Female Orgasms and the G-spot
Message-ID: <1988@moondance.cs.uq.oz>
Date: 30 Oct 89 11:40:32 GMT
References: <2599@basser.oz> <1701@moondance.cs.uq.oz> <2610@basser.oz> <1902@moondance.cs.uq.oz> <2662@basser.oz> <1947@moondance.cs.uq.oz> <2669@basser.oz>
Sender: news@moondance.cs.uq.oz
Reply-To: ant@batserver.cs.uq.oz
Followup-To: sci.bio
Lines: 20

pete@basser.oz (Peter Merel) writes:
>In article <1947@moondance.cs.uq.oz> ant@batserver.cs.uq.oz writes:
>>Unfortunately I am not prepared to spend the time that you have looking for
>>articles to the contrary.  I think however I could find an equally convincing
>>array of articles denying the existance of the G-Spot.  It is the same with
>>anything that is not completely understood in science I suppose.
>Read 'em again, ant. Those articles DO deny the existance of a G-spot. If you
>mean articles denying vaginal erotic sensitivity - I couldn't find any. I
>still haven't looked up Hoch & Alzate in the SCI, but will do sometime in
>the next week.

Oops, sorry, it has been a tough week.  Entertaining a girl you haven't seen in
three years for the week before swot vac can be very exhausting (but also very
entertaining :')

Didn't get the chance to apply any of your experience though :'(

| \o/        Anthony Murdoch             ant@batserver.cs.uq.oz
| -O- ant    Dept of Computer Science    "It's great to be young and insane"
| /0\        University of Queensland     - Dream Team