Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!att!cbnews!military From: shafer@drynix (Mary Shafer) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Luftwaffe, comments, etc. Message-ID: <10791@cbnews.ATT.COM> Date: 31 Oct 89 04:06:20 GMT Sender: military@cbnews.ATT.COM Lines: 27 Approved: military@att.att.com From: Mary Shafer Another element in the British success in the Battle of Britain is the "home field advantage". When a British airplane was shot down over Britain, the crew was frequently saved. It's a great deal easier to produce a new airplane than to produce a new crew. When Luftwaffe airplanes were shot down over Britain, both the airplane and the crew were lost to the Germans. Of course, the tables were turned when the Allies started bombing Europe. This same effect worked to the US's disadvantage in Viet Nam. BTW, my uncle was a B-17 navigator who was shot down over Ploesti (in _the_ raid) and smuggled out by the Resistance. When he rejoined the US forces, he went back to flying almost immediately. Air crew were very valuable. -- Mary Shafer shafer@elxsi.dfrf.nasa.gov ames!elxsi.dfrf.nasa.gov!shafer NASA Ames-Dryden Flight Research Facility, Edwards, CA Of course I don't speak for NASA