Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!usc!apple!motcsd!hpda!hpcupt1!hpisod2!dhepner
From: dhepner@hpisod2.HP.COM (Dan Hepner)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: Client/server model in popular portable relational databases
Message-ID: <13520002@hpisod2.HP.COM>
Date: 14 Nov 89 21:00:17 GMT
References: <24456@sequent.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett Packard, Cupertino
Lines: 14

From: eric@pyramid.pyramid.com (Eric Bergan)
> 
> 	Actually, there are a number of standards efforts underway to
> try and define a standard UNIX thread API. POSIX, UI, and OSF all
> have groups meeting on this, and they actually are trying to converge
> on a single standard. Further, since there are several reasonable models
> to look at, its reasonable to assume that we can probably define a
> useful standard. []

Do any of these standards imply any given multiple processor shared
memory data cache behavior?

Thanks,
Dan Hepner