Xref: utzoo news.groups:14524 comp.graphics:8467
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!psueea!parsely!agora!rickc
From: rickc@agora.UUCP (Rick Coates)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.graphics
Subject: Re: Comp.graphics.images SOURCES GROUP YES!
Summary: source group yes
Message-ID: <1693@agora.UUCP>
Date: 14 Nov 89 16:28:26 GMT
References: <30763@mips.mips.COM> <4810@rice-chex.ai.mit.edu> <340@vixen.uucp> <345@scorn.sco.COM>
Organization: Advanced Solutions, Hillsboro, OR
Lines: 29

In article <345@scorn.sco.COM>, davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat) writes:
> 
...
> -> I think it is wrong to mix a newsgroup for program sources and tools
> -> with a newsgroup for images.
> -
...
> -
> -  2 newsgroups.
> -  One for image conversion, utilities whatever.
> -  One for actual images.
> 
...

I've missed some of this discussion - nobody mentioned on the subject line
that a sources newsgroup was being considered.  YES to the source group.
Even though I regularly scan this newsgroup, the number of postings is
great enough that I often miss interesting source postings (does anybody
have the CGM posting that was mentioned by the person defending the size
of his image - also, thanks for the image!).

Enough sources go through this group to justify a new group.


Rick Coates
Consulting H/W - S/W engineer
(Graphics - Sun - Unix - ASIC design - imbedded systems)

...!tektronix!tessi!agora!rickc