Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!texbell!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Separate data and function address spaces
Summary: Semi-exhaustive list of model names.
Message-ID: <6983@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 15 Nov 89 20:54:32 GMT
References: <1989Nov10.123033.2494@virtech.uucp> <930@fiver.UUCP> <1620@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 19

On various compilers, I've seen the following (I may have mixed up compact
and medium):

64K code+data				compact, tiny, com, small, impure
64K code + 64K data			small, split, pure
64K code + segmented data		large data, compact
64K code + unsegmented data		huge data
segmented code + 64K data		large code, medium
segmented code + segmented data		large
segmented code + unsegmented data	huge, large

Any of these with >64K data may have 16- or 32- bit ints. 

And people wonder why I dislike segments.
-- 
`-_-' Peter da Silva <peter@ficc.uu.net> <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.
 'U`  --------------  +1 713 274 5180.
"*Real* wizards don't whine about how they paid their dues"
	-- Quentin Johnson quent@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu