Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!claris!sts!sts!roy
From: roy@sts.sts.COM
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: local addresses with smail 2.5
Message-ID: <83800002@sts>
Date: 9 Nov 89 17:12:22 GMT
References: <83800001@sts>
Lines: 23
Nf-ID: #R:sts:83800001:sts:83800002:000:898
Nf-From: sts.sts.COM!roy    Nov  9 08:41:00 1989


/* Written 10:02 am  Nov  6, 1989 by roy@sts.sts.COM in sts:comp.mail.uucp */
/* ---------- "local addresses with smail 2.5" ---------- */
I have a strange problem with smail on local addresses.  We have a Sun
.
.
.
/* End of text from sts:comp.mail.uucp */

Ok, no takers on that one.  Another possibility I've heard of is
Smail3.  I've been told before that it's not been released yet, but I
keep seeing sites that are using it.  I can tell because it says
'smail3.xx.x' in the mail header.  Would smail3 solve 'user@sts.COM'
vs. 'user@workstation.sts.COM' addressing anomaly?  If it does, how
would I get smail3?  As far as I can tell, smail should be smart
enough to know those are in the same domain ... (it would be a shame
to have to go hacking around in the smail code if this 'feature' has
already been fixed!)  Thanks!

Roy Bixler
ASIX/STS
(415) 770-3507 x364
..!ames!claris!sts!asix!roy