Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!apple!agate!helios.ee.lbl.gov!hellgate.utah.edu!cc.utah.edu!orcutt
From: ORCUTT@cc.utah.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: Minix virtual memory
Message-ID: <35877@cc.utah.edu>
Date: 10 Nov 89 03:07:51 GMT
Lines: 8

I also would LOVE to see a MINIX with support for the
'386 VM.  The '286 is brain-damaged; look how long
uSoft and IBM have been fighting it with OS/2.
I have just acquired '386 XENIX; I can compile
programs with large arrays, large code, or whatever,
and they run FAST and without stupid segmenting.
My advice would be to let the '286 processor die
a quiet death and write new software for the '386.