Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!henry.jpl.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!peregrine!ccicpg!felix!martin From: martin@felix.UUCP (Martin McKendry) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2 Subject: Re: Why is OS/2 a memory hog? Message-ID: <124944@felix.UUCP> Date: 8 Nov 89 17:15:26 GMT References: <89304.173824GIAMPAL@AUVM.BITNET> <3056@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU> <89307.092707GIAMPAL@AUVM.BITNET> Sender: daemon@felix.UUCP Reply-To: martin@felix.UUCP (Martin McKendry) Organization: FileNet Corp., Costa Mesa, CA Lines: 40 In article <89307.092707GIAMPAL@AUVM.BITNET> GIAMPAL@AUVM.BITNET writes: >You said that OS/2 is small for its power. I'm naive about what it offers at >a technical level, so I'd like to know what it's power is. All that the >press about it has mentioned is that it multi-tasks, and that is NO reason >to require such a large amount of memory. I really would like to hear >a technical discussion of what it offers. Nothing I have read (which isn't >much) has mentioned if it has virtual memory or protected memory, etc... > What about the IPC support that it has? Is it easy to use? What about >spawning child processes, etc... You need to read, or at least peruse "Inside OS/2", by Gordon Letwin, Microsoft Press, 1988, ISBN 1-55615-117-9, $19.95 at a store year you. I got mine at B. Dalton. OS/2 has almost everything that Unix System V Release 4 has, and then a few things. It is very extensive, and in general contains the most current version of whatever feature you want. For example, it has more support for process management -- lightweight processes & semaphores etc -- than most versions of Unix. Discussions about OS/2 tend to be a little religious, and tend to be based on previous experience with MS-DOS. OS/2 is a real operating system, just as current versions of Unix are. Its 'power' is just what you would expect -- no more or less. However, when contrasted with MS-DOS, it looks very powerful, and this tends to dominate discussions. In fact, OS/2 has so many features derived from the Unix world, that you have to wonder if royalty avoidance didn't play a part in the decision to build a new operating system. (Not that there is anything wrong with learning from Unix: any competant engineer studies the current state of the art before building something new). -- Martin S. McKendry; FileNet Corp; {hplabs,oliveb,spsd,zardoz}!felix!martin Strictly my opinion; all of it