Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!texbell!attctc!jolnet!swan
From: swan@jolnet.ORPK.IL.US (Joel Swan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: New Agnus
Keywords: Agnus, Part Number.
Message-ID: <2054@jolnet.ORPK.IL.US>
Date: 9 Nov 89 12:21:05 GMT
References: <1567@ultb.UUCP> <779@dsacg2.UUCP>
Reply-To: swan@jolnet.UUCP (Joel Swan)
Organization: Media Specialties LTD
Lines: 28

In article <779@dsacg2.UUCP> nor1675@dsacg2.UUCP (Michael Figg) writes:
:In article <1567@ultb.UUCP>, smc8516@ultb.UUCP (S.M. Curtin) writes:
:> 
:> Could someone please post the part number difference between the old
:> (512k) Agnus and the new 1 meg agnus. I would like to see if 
:> I've got the new one in my machine but the trace changes have not been
:The quick and easy (very easy) way to find out is just to run 'Avail' (a
:standard AmigaDOS command) and see how much Chip ram you have. 

DUH.   Look at the persons question.  His traces haven't been cut so the
1 meg wouldn't show up.  That's the whole point of why he needs the
PART NUMBER.

:2 bits, 4 bits, 6 bits, a byte
:all for MS-DOS, go take a hike.
:
:I know, its really juvenille, I couldn't help it. I'm so ashamed!
:
:
:-- 
:"Hot Damn! Groat Cakes Again  |  Michael Figg
:Heavy on the thirty weight!"  |  DLA Systems Automation Center - Columbus,Oh

According to my installation paper the Fatter Agnus 8372 IC has a part no. 
PN#318069-02.
That's PN#318069-02 (I've repeated in case a bit gets dropped along the line).

Joel